On 08/19/16 04:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 08/19/16 04:00, Fan, Jeff wrote: >> Laszlo, >> >> I could revert this patch firstly. > > Thank you, that would be very kind. > >> Could you please dig out the OVMF to address the potential issue, then I >> could re-commit it for those platforms required this patch. > > The problem is that this week (what remains of it) and the next week I > won't really have time for this -- tomorrow I'm hoping to finish up > something else in a mortal hurry. It was actually in preparation for > rebasing / pushing that work that I pulled "master", and found out about > the regression. > > Can we perhaps get help from the variable stack maintainers? What's the > design of the (lack of) depexes on those drivers? > > Anyway, if you could live with the patch reverted for one or two weeks, > then reverting it would be best, IMO. It results in a regression, even > if ultimately it might only expose a bug in something else.
I can see the revert (commit eadf70bdfbc1cb14a1d52b4840ca831d172d0399), thank you! As I said, I hope I can look into this (as well...) the week after next, or maybe a bit later... Sorry about the inconvenience :( Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
