Laszlo, Thanks for your willing to review all CPU changes. We also found Ovmf is a very special system and need to take it in to consideration when do the changes.
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <[email protected]> Thanks, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 6:53 PM > To: edk2-devel-01 <[email protected]> > Cc: Andrew Fish <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Jeff > Fan <[email protected]>; Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>; > Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Ni, Ruiyu > <[email protected]> > Subject: [PATCH] Maintainers.txt: add Laszlo Ersek as UefiCpuPkg reviewer > > UefiCpuPkg hosts a number of modules (SMM infrastructure, > MP-initialization) that may behave differently enough between virtualization > guests and physical boards that they merit regression testing and review > specifically from a virtualization perspective. > > Add Laszlo as a UefiCpuPkg reviewer (not maintainer) so that he be CC'd on > all UefiCpuPkg patches. > > > R: Package Reviewer: Cc address for patches and questions. Reviewers > > help maintainers review code, but don't have push access. > > Cc: Andrew Fish <[email protected]> > Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]> > Cc: Jeff Fan <[email protected]> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]> > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> > --- > > Notes: > Recently there have been two UefiCpuPkg patches on the list that have > each spent hardly more than 24 hours in review: > > * d76c2da8d50d ("MdeModulePkg/PiSmmCore: Install Protocol when S3 > resume > finished.", 2017-10-11), > > * 0594ec417c89 ("UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Enhance waiting for AP > initialization logic.", 2017-10-23). > > Both times, I was out of office, and didn't get a chance to comment. The > first commit broke OVMF: > > http://mid.mail-archive.com/8d678707-fb07-0326-acfd- > [email protected] > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/152e8d7670d5 > > while the second commit has a good chance to break OVMF on at least > some > virt hosts: > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-October/016309.html > > I was not CC'd either time. Had I been CC'd, the automated out-of-office > reply that I always set up would have been received on the submitter's > side, and I could have tested and/or commented on the patches in > question, before they were pushed. > > My intent as a UefiCpuPkg Reviewer is to be inserted in the patch review > process for UefiCpuPkg. I should be explicitly CC'd; and my feedback > should please be waited upon. I think I've proved myself reasonably > responsive; I intend to follow up in a few days every time. My review > should definitely not replace Eric's review, but I'd like to get an > *official* chance to raise questions before a patch is pushed. Whenever > I have nothing to add, I'll send an Acked-by. Thanks. > > Maintainers.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Maintainers.txt b/Maintainers.txt index > c1a5723af9db..297a9bfd2b56 100644 > --- a/Maintainers.txt > +++ b/Maintainers.txt > @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ M: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]> > UefiCpuPkg > W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UefiCpuPkg > M: Eric Dong <[email protected]> > +R: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> > > UnixPkg > W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UnixPkg > -- > 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
