Are we redefining a function from BaseLib?  Why not remove the redundant 
definition instead of making it match?

-Jaben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paulo Alcantara [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]>; Carsey, Jaben
> <[email protected]>; Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] ShellPkg: Fix type mismatch with GCC
> Importance: High
> 
> This patch fixes the following warning reported by GCC 6.3:
> 
> /home/pcacjr/src/edk2.git/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/U
> efiShellLevel2CommandsLib.c:271:1:
> warning: type of ‘InternalCharToUpper’ does not match original decl
> aration [-Wlto-type-mismatch]
>  InternalCharToUpper (
>  ^
> /home/pcacjr/src/edk2.git/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/String.c:555:1: note:
> ‘InternalCharToUpper’ was previously declared here
>  InternalCharToUpper (
>  ^
> 
> Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib
> .c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git
> a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2Commands
> Lib.c
> b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2Commands
> Lib.c
> index 7948e53cfc..bab6631e15 100644
> ---
> a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2Commands
> Lib.c
> +++
> b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2Commands
> Lib.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ VerifyIntermediateDirectories (
>    @return Char as an upper case character.
>  **/
>  CHAR16
> +EFIAPI
>  InternalCharToUpper (
>    IN CONST CHAR16                    Char
>    );
> --
> 2.11.0

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to