On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:05:24AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> BaseDebugLibSerialPort is not suitable for use by DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER
> modules, so blacklist it for use by such modules.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf 
> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf
> index 823511b22f6b..25da1fb9363a 100644
> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf
> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ [Defines]
>    FILE_GUID                      = BB83F95F-EDBC-4884-A520-CD42AF388FAE
>    MODULE_TYPE                    = BASE
>    VERSION_STRING                 = 1.0
> -  LIBRARY_CLASS                  = DebugLib 
> +  LIBRARY_CLASS                  = DebugLib|SEC PEI_CORE PEIM DXE_CORE 
> DXE_DRIVER DXE_SMM_DRIVER DXE_SAL_DRIVER UEFI_DRIVER UEFI_APPLICATION 
> SMM_CORE MM_STANDALONE MM_CORE_STANDALONE

Not a comment on this patch as such (which looks sensible to me), but
what you're doing here isn't blacklisting DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER, but
rather whitelisting every other module type.

Could we use a ! operator added to the syntax?

/
    Leif

>    CONSTRUCTOR                    = BaseDebugLibSerialPortConstructor
>  
>  #
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to