Right.
I think we only support clear the page attribute, and we don't support the 
cache attribute.
Using OR for RUNTIME is good.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:41 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>;
> Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Yi Li <[email protected]>; Gao,
> Liming <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Renhao
> Liang <[email protected]>; Zeng, Star <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute conversion
> 
> Just thought more about the case.
> 
> If a memory range has WB attribute, and code is to set RUNTIME attribute, then
> the WB attribute will be clear in GCD database, it seems wrong. :(
> For this case, need have OR operation ( | RUNTIME) to original attribute in 
> GCD
> database?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Star
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:34 AM
> To: Zeng, Star <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>;
> Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Yi Li <[email protected]>; Gao,
> Liming <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Renhao
> Liang <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute conversion
> 
> That is good idea.
> 
> Just add more description as the code comment, please.
> 
> It is easy for code review later.
> 
> Thank you
> Yao Jiewen
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zeng, Star
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:33 AM
> > To: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J
> > <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D
> > <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Yi Li <[email protected]>;
> > Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>;
> > Renhao Liang <[email protected]>; Zeng, Star
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > conversion
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> > And I agree we need the fix at
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-April/023364.html from
> > Mike for compatibility.
> > And I think more precious and precise information need to be added
> > into the commit log or code comments since we have been crazy about
> > handling attributes in the GCD service. :)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Star
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yao, Jiewen
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:26 AM
> > To: Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>; Zeng, Star
> > <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>;
> > Heyi Guo <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Yi Li <[email protected]>;
> > Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>;
> > Renhao Liang <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > conversion
> >
> > I have a discussion with Star/Jian.
> >
> > The expectation for the CPU driver is to handle PageAttribute.
> > The expectation for the platform driver is to use GetAttribute(),
> > AND/OR attribute, then call SetAttribute().
> > Because the DRAM always has a cache attribute (no matter UC or WB), 0
> > should not happen. (0 might happen for a GCD reserved memory, but
> > there is no need to set page attribute)
> >
> > If all drivers use above way, there won't be any issue. There is no
> > need to introduce a new protocol so far.
> >
> > We did encounter some error, because the platform/silicon/CPU code is
> > not updated yet. (For example, the MinnowMax which is using binary)
> > The fix to filter 0 seems a workable way to resolve the compatibility issue.
> >
> > Later, I suggest we update MinnowMax binary - Add paging handling for
> > CPU driver, and use GetAttribute()/SetAttribute() for platform/silicon code.
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> > Yao Jiewen
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > > Of Wang, Jian J
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:24 AM
> > > To: Zeng, Star <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D
> > > <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo <[email protected]>;
> > > [email protected]
> > > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Yi Li <[email protected]>;
> > > Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric
> > > <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of
> > > attribute conversion
> > >
> > > The NX Memory Protection and Heap Guard features need to clear
> > > paging attributes.
> > > Allowing 0 attribute is the current only choice without changing arch
> protocol.
> > > Maybe
> > > It's time to introduce a new protocol.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jian
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Zeng, Star
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 9:16 AM
> > > > To: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo
> > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > > Cc: Yi Li <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang
> > > > <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Gao,
> > > > Liming <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J
> > > > <[email protected]>; Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Zeng,
> > > > Star <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > > > conversion
> > > >
> > > > Current gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes does not support getting memory
> > > > attributes, and has no clear description about clearing memory 
> > > > attributes.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed we introduced
> > > >
> > >
> >
> SmmMemoryAttribute(MdeModulePkg\Include\Protocol\SmmMemoryAttribut
> > > e.
> > > > h) protocol for heap guard feature in SMM environment.
> > > > Seemingly, we also need introduce MemoryAttribute protocol for DXE?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Star
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Zeng, Star
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 8:59 AM
> > > > To: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo
> > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > > Cc: Yi Li <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang
> > > > <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Gao,
> > > > Liming <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J
> > > > <[email protected]>; Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Zeng,
> > > > Star <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > > > conversion
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Agree the problem.
> > > > We need support only RUNTIME attribute.
> > > > We need support only cache attributes.
> > > > We need support only page attributes.
> > > > We need support RUNTIME + cache + page attributes.
> > > > Do we need support the 0 Attributes case to clear page attributes?
> > > > There was discussion about the 0 Attributes case at
> > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-March/023315.html.
> > > > It came to the question that should the 0 Attributes case be
> > > > handled by
> > > > SetMemoryAttributes() to clear the page attributes?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Star
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 5:43 AM
> > > > To: Zeng, Star <[email protected]>; Heyi Guo
> > > > <[email protected]>; edk2- [email protected]; Kinney, Michael D
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Yi Li <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang
> > > > <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Gao,
> > > > Liming <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J
> > > > <[email protected]>; Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > > > conversion
> > > >
> > > > Star,
> > > >
> > > > This commit breaks Vlv2TbltDevicePkg.
> > > >
> > > > On this platform, there are 2 calls to
> > > > gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes() for an MMIO
> > > > range to set only the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME bit.
> > > >
> > > > With this commit, ConverToCpuArchAttributes()returns 0, and 0 is
> > > > passed to
> > > > gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes()that returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER on
> > > > Vlv2TbltDevicePkg.
> > > >
> > > > Before this commit, ConverToCpuArchAttributes() returns
> > > > INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES which causes the call to gCpu-
> > > > >SetMemoryAttributes()to be skipped so no error is generated.
> > > >
> > > > I think the right fix is to skip the call to
> > > > gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes() if CpuArchAttributes
> > > > is 0 so a call that only sets the RUNTIME attribute can be
> > > > supported along with call the set both the RUNTIME bit and other cache
> related bits.
> > > >
> > > > I will send a patch soon with the proposed fix.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Zeng, Star
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 10:59 PM
> > > > > To: Heyi Guo <[email protected]>; edk2- [email protected]
> > > > > Cc: Yi Li <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>;
> > > > > Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Gao, Liming
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>;
> > > > > Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>; Zeng, Star <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > > > > conversion
> > > > >
> > > > > Pushed at 5b91bf82c67b586b9588cbe4bbffa1588f6b5926.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Star
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Heyi Guo [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:20 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Cc: Heyi Guo <[email protected]>; Yi Li
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Renhao Liang
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Zeng, Star <[email protected]>;
> > > > > Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Gao, Liming
> > > > > <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>;
> > > > > Ni, Ruiyu <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Gcd: Fix bug of attribute
> > > > > conversion
> > > > >
> > > > > For gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes(), when user passes a combined
> > > > > memory attribute including CPU arch attribute and other
> > > > > attributes, like EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME,
> > > > > ConverToCpuArchAttributes() will return
> > > > > INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES and skip setting page/cache
> > > > > attribute for
> > the specified memory space.
> > > > >
> > > > > We don't see any reason to forbid combining CPU arch attributes
> > > > > and non-CPU-arch attributes when calling gDS-
> > > > > >SetMemorySpaceAttributes(), so we remove the check code
> > > > > in ConverToCpuArchAttributes(); the remaining code is enough to
> > > > > grab the interested bits for
> > > > > Cpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
> > > > >
> > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <[email protected]>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yi Li <[email protected]>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Renhao Liang <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Star Zeng <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Jian J Wang <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c | 5 -----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> > > > > b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c index
> > > > > 77f4adb4bc01..907245a3f512 100644
> > > > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> > > > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Gcd/Gcd.c
> > > > > @@ -673,11 +673,6 @@ ConverToCpuArchAttributes (  {
> > > > >    UINT64      CpuArchAttributes;
> > > > >
> > > > > -  if ((Attributes & ~(EXCLUSIVE_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES |
> > > > > -                      NONEXCLUSIVE_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES))
> > > > > != 0) {
> > > > > -    return INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES;
> > > > > -  }
> > > > > -
> > > > >    CpuArchAttributes = Attributes &
> > > > > NONEXCLUSIVE_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES;
> > > > >
> > > > >    if ( (Attributes & EFI_MEMORY_UC) == EFI_MEMORY_UC) {
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > edk2-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to