pon., 8 paź 2018 o 15:43 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > On 8 October 2018 at 15:37, Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]> wrote: > > pon., 8 paź 2018 o 15:27 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > >> > >> On 8 October 2018 at 15:17, Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > pon., 8 paź 2018 o 15:07 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > >> > napisał(a): > >> >> > >> >> On 8 October 2018 at 14:59, Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Ard, > >> >> > > >> >> > pon., 8 paź 2018 o 14:41 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > >> >> > napisał(a): > >> >> >> > >> >> >> (add MdeModulePkg maintainers) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 5 October 2018 at 15:25, Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > From: Tomasz Michalec <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Some SD Host Controlers use different values in Host Control 2 > >> >> >> > Register > >> >> >> > to select UHS Mode. This patch adds a new UhsSignaling type > >> >> >> > routine to > >> >> >> > the NotifyPhase of the SdMmcOverride protocol. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > UHS signaling configuration is moved to a common, default routine > >> >> >> > (SdMmcHcUhsSignaling), which is called when SdMmcOverride does not > >> >> >> > cover this functionality. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > --- > >> >> >> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h | 50 +++++++ > >> >> >> > MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h | 2 + > >> >> >> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c | 153 > >> >> >> > ++++++++++++-------- > >> >> >> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c | 37 +++-- > >> >> >> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c | 69 +++++++++ > >> >> >> > 5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h > >> >> >> > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h > >> >> >> > index e389d52..a03160d 100644 > >> >> >> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h > >> >> >> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h > >> >> >> > @@ -63,6 +63,39 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY > >> >> >> > KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. > >> >> >> > #define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_VER 0xFE > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > // > >> >> >> > +// SD Host Controler bits to HOST_CTRL2 register > >> >> >> > +// > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_MASK 0x0007 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR12 0x0000 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR25 0x0001 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR50 0x0002 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_SDR104 0x0003 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_UHS_DDR50 0x0004 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_DDR52 0x0004 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR50 0x0002 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR25 0x0001 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_MMC_SDR12 0x0000 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_HS200 0x0003 > >> >> >> > +#define SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_HS400 0x0005 > >> >> >> > + > > > > In case we move enums to SdMmcOverride.h, would it be desired, to move > > there register fields values as well? Or should I rather use Xenon > > macros for all of above locally? > > > > No, I think the macros should be kept locally. > > >> >> >> > +// > >> >> >> > +// Timing modes for uhs > >> >> >> > +// > >> >> >> > +typedef enum { > >> >> >> > + SdMmcUhsSdr12, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcUhsSdr25, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcUhsSdr50, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcUhsSdr104, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcUhsDdr50, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcDdr52, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcSdr50, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcSdr25, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcSdr12, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcHs200, > >> >> >> > + SdMmcMmcHs400, > >> >> >> > +} SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING; > >> >> >> > + > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Here, we end up with two sets of symbolic constants for the same > >> >> >> thing, and I suppose this enum will be duplicated in your > >> >> >> SdMmcOverride implementation? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Why duplicated? Macros are for generic UHS_MODE_SEL field values for > >> >> > SD and MMC in HostControl2Register. > >> >> > > >> >> > SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING is just a timing mode indicator, it can be used not > >> >> > only in UhsSignaling routine (actually the next patch, with > >> >> > SwitchClockFreqPost, use it...). > >> >> > > >> >> > In my SdMmcOverride implementation this enum is not duplicated, > >> >> > because this file (SdMmcPciHci.h) is included via > >> >> > Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Ah ok. Please don't expose internal headers of the SD/MMC driver via > >> >> Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h > >> >> > >> > > >> > OK. > >> > > >> >> I think it should be fine to add the enum definition to > >> >> Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h instead. > >> >> > >> > > >> > OK. > >> > > >> >> But wouldn't it be much easier to have a hook for setting > >> >> HostControl2Register that decodes the value and modifies it according > >> >> to what the platform requires? > >> >> > >> > > >> > Can you please explain, how it will be different from UhsSignaling in > >> > current shape (read required timing value and update UHS_MODE_SEL > >> > field)? > >> > > >> > >> Well, you decode the value, and if, e.g., the SD_MMC_HC_CTRL_HS200 > >> bits are set, you substitute them with the appropriate xenon values. > > > > Because values can be same for SD and MMC (e.g. UHS_104 and HS200), > > from the controller driver perspective, how would I know, which mode > > is requested? > > > > Good point. > > >> > >> Also, how important is it to drive the SD/MMC at its max rated speed > >> at boot time? On Synquacer, I just disable HS200 in the capability > >> struct so I can forget about all this stuff > > > > Some customers want it - a real life scenario from one of them: > > applications, Linux binaries and rootfs stores in the MMC. Each boot a > > couple of hundreds of MB to be loaded. Thanks to HS200 we have huge > > time saving. > > > > Do you mean in the initrd? Because otherwise, Linux will use its own > driver and select its own mode.
No, I mean loading >300MB images from eMMC to memory in the DXE phase, before booting anything. > > And btw, does the spec permit using different HC2 values for HS200 / HS400 ? According to SD Host Controller Specification v4.20, UHS_MODE_SEL values 0x5 and 0x6 are "reserved". According to Linux code, HS400 value is treated as "non-standard" and HS200 should be same as for SDR104 (0x3). Nothing is written about permiting different values, but given Linux 'sdhci_set_uhs_signaling' and whole bunch of other quirks used under drivers/mmc overriding standard behavior is very common. Please let know your desired way of handling custom UhsSignaling. Best regards, MArcin _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
