On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:20 PM Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/06/18 14:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 6/11/18 14:36, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 11/06/18 12:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> > >>> ... While we discuss this, I'll go ahead and push the first four > >>> patches. The code being reverted is dead anyway. I'll report back about > >>> the commit hashes. > >> > >> Before pushing the first four patches, I regression-tested them as well. > >> Using: Cirrus, stdvga, and QXL. My QEMU version was > >> v3.0.0-1763-gb2f7a038bb4c. The machine type was "pc-q35-3.0". > >> > >> For the first four patches: > >> - Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>, > >> - pushed them as commit range 62ea70e31285..328409ce8de7. > > > > Thanks Laszlo! > > A bit late, but 1-4 reviewed too. > > can you please formally state your R-b, for the first four patches? For > when I apply them again, after edk2-stable201811.
Sure, I was not aware the "reply to cover" option was not formal for this list, I'll do. (TIL: "reply to cover" is list CoC specific) _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
