On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 01:04, Gao, Liming <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <[email protected]> for this serials.
>

Thanks all

Series pushed as 64ab2c82e8f6..8efc6d84ca41

(with the requested MAX_UINT16 -> MAX_UINT32 change applied)

> On patch 4, I have the same comments to Laszlo.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ard
> >Biesheuvel
> >Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2018 6:46 AM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Cc: Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Carsey, Jaben
> ><[email protected]>; Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
> >Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 0/6] BaseTools: get rid of MAX_UINTN
> >
> >There should be no reason for the build tools to care about the native
> >word size of a particular target, so relying on a definition of MAX_UINTN
> >is definitely wrong, and most likely inaccurate on 32-bit build hosts.
> >
> >So refactor the code in CommonLib and DevicePath so we no longer rely
> >on this definition.
> >
> >Changes since v1:
> >- miss type change in #1 causing a build failure on MSVC
> >- add acks from Jaben
> >
> >Cc: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
> >Cc: Yonghong Zhu <[email protected]>
> >Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]>
> >Cc: Bob Feng <[email protected]>
> >Cc: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]>
> >
> >Ard Biesheuvel (6):
> >  BaseTools/CommonLib: avoid using 'native' word size in IP address
> >    handling
> >  BaseTools/CommonLib: use explicit 64-bit type in Strtoi()
> >  BaseTools/DevicePath: use explicit 64-bit number parsing routines
> >  BaseTools/DevicePath: use MAX_UINT16 as default device path max size
> >  BaseTools/CommonLib: get rid of 'native' type string parsing routines
> >  BaseTools/CommonLib: drop definition of MAX_UINTN
> >
> > BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h         |  25 ---
> > BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.c         | 206 ++----------------
> > .../Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathFromText.c  |   4 +-
> > .../Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c |   4 +-
> > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 214 deletions(-)
> >
> >--
> >2.19.1
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >edk2-devel mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to