Not sure why you'd take that out when someone using UINTN for variables may want to use MAX_UINTN ? Future may be different.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/30/18 23:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > The maximum value that can be represented by the native word size > > of the *target* should be irrelevant when compiling tools that > > run on the build *host*. So drop the definition of MAX_UINTN, now > > that we no longer use it. > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <[email protected]> > > --- > > BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h > b/BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h > > index 6930d9227b87..b1c6c00a3478 100644 > > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h > > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/Common/CommonLib.h > > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, > EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. > > > > #define MAX_LONG_FILE_PATH 500 > > > > -#define MAX_UINTN MAX_ADDRESS > > #define MAX_UINT64 ((UINT64)0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL) > > #define MAX_UINT16 ((UINT16)0xFFFF) > > #define MAX_UINT8 ((UINT8)0xFF) > > > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
