On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 17:40, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 01/14/19 14:27, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > The SMM based FTW and variable drivers are going to depend on > > MmServicesTableLib after a subsequent patch, so add a resolution > > for it to various OvmfPkg .dsc files. > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > > --- > > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc | 1 + > > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc | 1 + > > OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc > > index 3f3533e5c163..aee19b75d7ae 100644 > > --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc > > +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc > > @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ [LibraryClasses.common.DXE_SMM_DRIVER] > > > > ReportStatusCodeLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeReportStatusCodeLib/DxeReportStatusCodeLib.inf > > HobLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf > > SmmMemLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmMemLib/SmmMemLib.inf > > + > > MmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/MmServicesTableLib/MmServicesTableLib.inf > > > > SmmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmServicesTableLib/SmmServicesTableLib.inf > > !ifdef $(DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT) > > DebugLib|MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc > > index 6c08b2728d63..90cbd8e34158 100644 > > --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc > > +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc > > @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ [LibraryClasses.common.DXE_SMM_DRIVER] > > > > ReportStatusCodeLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeReportStatusCodeLib/DxeReportStatusCodeLib.inf > > HobLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf > > SmmMemLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmMemLib/SmmMemLib.inf > > + > > MmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/MmServicesTableLib/MmServicesTableLib.inf > > > > SmmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmServicesTableLib/SmmServicesTableLib.inf > > !ifdef $(DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT) > > DebugLib|MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc > > index 4072c839d73f..83d16eb00b82 100644 > > --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc > > +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc > > @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ [LibraryClasses.common.DXE_SMM_DRIVER] > > > > ReportStatusCodeLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeReportStatusCodeLib/DxeReportStatusCodeLib.inf > > HobLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf > > SmmMemLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmMemLib/SmmMemLib.inf > > + > > MmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/MmServicesTableLib/MmServicesTableLib.inf > > > > SmmServicesTableLib|MdePkg/Library/SmmServicesTableLib/SmmServicesTableLib.inf > > !ifdef $(DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT) > > DebugLib|MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf > > > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >
Thanks. > Also, because this patch is clearly equivalent (although not textually > identical) to the one I used in > <0d229de3-623a-1062-1daf-cce5dec14824@redhat.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/0d229de3-623a-1062-1daf-cce5dec14824@redhat.com>, > I believe we should add: > > Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > OK. > (From the blurb, I sought to familiarize myself with the anatomy of this > v2 series, and after checking my R-t-b on patches v2 05/17 and v2 07/17, > I think v2 02/17 -- i.e., this patch -- is the only one where my review > is required. Please correct me if I'm wrong.) > Indeed. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
