Lazlo: I agree. I don't think there is the rule break for the patch set of boot progress reporting. I also prefer to push them early next week.
Thanks Liming > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 4:20 AM > To: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Soft Feature Freeze starts today for > edk2-stable201903 > > Hi Liming, > > On 02/22/19 15:25, Gao, Liming wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning > > lists edk2-stable201903 tag planning. Now, we enter > into Soft Feature Freeze phase. In this phase, the feature without > Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags will be delayed after the upcoming stable > tag. The patch review can continue without break. Below is edk2-stable201903 > tag planning. > > > > 2019-03-08 Beginning of development > > 2019-02-22 Soft Feature Freeze > > 2019-03-01 Hard Feature Freeze > > 2019-03-08 Release > > I got the last missing R-b from Ray for my patch set > > [edk2] [PATCH v3 0/5] MdeModulePkg, OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: more visible > boot progress reporting > > today (2019-02-22) at 12:50 in my time zone (CET = UTC+01:00). Before > pushing the series, I asked Ray to confirm one last thing about his > review. I consider the series properly reviewed, but due to this last > question, I expect I should push it early next week. > > IMO that satisfies the soft feature freeze definition: > > https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/SoftFeatureFreeze > > "By the date of the soft feature freeze, developers must have sent their > patches to the mailing list and received positive maintainer reviews > (Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags). [...] Between the soft feature freeze > and the hard feature freeze, previously reviewed and unit-tested > features may be applied (or merged) to the master branch, for > integration testing." > > Do you (and others) agree? > > If not, I won't insist -- while I'd certainly prefer these patches to be > in the upcoming stable tag, if the community perceives it would mean > bending the rules, I wouldn't want to do that. (Right now I don't think > it would bend the rules). > > Thanks, > Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
