The current language for "Package Reviewer" only vaguely hints that
Package Reviewers should be able to provide guidance and directions.
Make this more obvious.
Cc: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <phi...@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
- this is clearly a political patch; feel free to disagree
- I'm proposing this for the next development cycle
Maintainers.txt | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Maintainers.txt b/Maintainers.txt
index 7772926b2fb1..ed090aeb4bdb 100644
--- a/Maintainers.txt
+++ b/Maintainers.txt
@@ -20,7 +20,10 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
M: Package Maintainer: Cc address for patches and questions. Responsible
for reviewing and pushing package changes to source control.
R: Package Reviewer: Cc address for patches and questions. Reviewers help
- maintainers review code, but don't have push access.
+ maintainers review code, but don't have push access. A designated Package
+ Reviewer is reasonably familiar with the Package (or some modules
+ thereof), and/or provides testing or regression testing for the Package
+ (or some modules thereof), in certain platforms and environments.
W: Web-page with status/info
T: SCM tree type and location. Type is one of: git, svn.
S: Status, one of the following:
--
2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
