On 2/27/19 10:21 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > The current language for "Package Reviewer" only vaguely hints that > Package Reviewers should be able to provide guidance and directions. > Make this more obvious. > > Cc: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> > Cc: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com> > Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> > Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <phi...@redhat.com> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > --- > > Notes: > - this is clearly a political patch; feel free to disagree > - I'm proposing this for the next development cycle > > Maintainers.txt | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Maintainers.txt b/Maintainers.txt > index 7772926b2fb1..ed090aeb4bdb 100644 > --- a/Maintainers.txt > +++ b/Maintainers.txt > @@ -20,7 +20,10 @@ Descriptions of section entries: > M: Package Maintainer: Cc address for patches and questions. Responsible > for reviewing and pushing package changes to source control. > R: Package Reviewer: Cc address for patches and questions. Reviewers help > - maintainers review code, but don't have push access. > + maintainers review code, but don't have push access. A designated > Package > + Reviewer is reasonably familiar with the Package (or some modules > + thereof), and/or provides testing or regression testing for the Package > + (or some modules thereof), in certain platforms and environments.
Definitively an improvement, thanks for clarifying this. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <phi...@redhat.com> > W: Web-page with status/info > T: SCM tree type and location. Type is one of: git, svn. > S: Status, one of the following: > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
