On 3/11/19 4:20 PM, stephano wrote:
On 3/11/2019 1:55 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
You can't see without following the pull request *who* committed the
change. There are almost 1000 open pull requests, which is something
we probably want to try and avoid. They also seem to have _lots_ of
labels. I wonder if there's a cleaner way of handling them?
Agreed. We spoke about some of the downsides of pull requests in the
last stewards meeting. Linus did a fair job of detailing some of these
here:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/17
I'm going to work with EDK II maintainers to be sure that we do not
move to a model that makes their life harder (e.g. 1000 open pull
requests).
Also, about groups.io, I wonder if I might want to investigate their
support for using our own domain, so people don't have to remember
that the mailing list and documents are on groups.io and not
tianocore.org?
Yes, I'm hoping to use our own domain with groups.io. Once we've
completed the testing phase I'll bring this up to my boss(es) to get
approval for an enterprise account ($200/month). That will allow us to
use something more friendly with tianocore.org.
Thanks! Sorry for the skepticism, I've just had experiences in the past
with new systems being introduced which made work more difficult (e.g. a
commercial code review tool: several teams avoided it by using Review
Board or Gerrit instead).
--
Rebecca Cran
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
