No there is no reason why I could not have use EmulatorPkg. I have just taken the bad habit to point new UEFI starters at either Nt32Pkg or UnixPkg following the host OS they are using.
Olivier -----Original Message----- From: Jordan Justen [mailto:jljus...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 July 2012 17:05 To: Olivier Martin Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed UnixPkg build On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Olivier Martin <olivier.mar...@arm.com> wrote: > Any comment ? Sorry for losing track of this, and thanks to Liming for looking it over. Obviously, it make sense to fix this, but I has a question. Is there any use case that you have for UnixPkg rather than EmulatorPkg? I am wondering if we should mark UnixPkg as deprecated, and refer people to EmulatorPkg. -Jordan > From: Olivier Martin > Sent: 11 July 2012 19:52 > To: 'Jordan Justen' > Cc: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [PATCH] Fixed UnixPkg build > > > > Dear UnixPkg maintainer, > > > > Please find the attached patch to fix the UnixPkg build. This patch fixes > the following build error: > > /tianocore/UnixPkg/UnixPkgX64.dsc(175): error F001: Pcd > (gEfiIntelFrameworkModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdStatusCodeUseOEM) defined in > DSC is not declared in DEC files. > > > > Regards, > > Olivier ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
