On 01/08/2013 03:59 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 15:42 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>
>> Hopefully Matt can look this over.
>>
>> Have fun with the MASM version of this, and I know I'll cringe when I
>> see the 32-bit code written in 64-bit assembly mode. :)
>
> Can't we just give out free licences for gas, for anyone who needs
> one? :)
>
> On a more serious note: can we do something evil like using nasm on
> Linux so I can actually test the MASM version once I've attempted to
> create it?
>
NASM isn't MASM, though; it is somewhat similar but far from identical.
For example, in MASM:
mov eax,foo
... can be either an immediate or a memory reference depending on
exactly how "foo" is declared.
There is an assembler called WASM/JWASM that is available for Linux
which is compatible with some ancient version of MASM.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
