I guess we should have changed the subject on this thread a while back. :) I hope some people might look back over the "[PATCH] Fix broken IA32 Microsoft assembler code in QemuFwCfgLib." thread if they are interested in this discussion.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com> wrote: > I don't have an issue if the edk2 moves to git. That is good to hear. > Maybe Joardan can bring this up with his co-workers > and report back to us. My guess is that most Intel contributors are not familiar with git, so they probably prefer to stick with what they know versus making a change. But, perhaps this thread can get more Intel contributors interested in at least trying git-svn. > It seem decisions like this are up to them. This may be less true now that the projects are hosted on a free hosting service. But, I think Intel still has the most contributions to the tianocore projects, so that definitely does carry weight. I still think the community expressing their preference will be the biggest help in getting a change made. So far, here is the data I have: * David/Jordan from Intel would prefer git * Laszlo from Red Hat would prefer git * Andrew from Apple is fine with either, but likes to use git-svn * Several of our Google Summer of Code projects have used git The data we will never have is how many people avoid getting involved in the project because it uses svn rather than git. I think if it were possible to measure this, it would favor git compared to svn. -Jordan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
