On 06/24/13 15:12, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On the other hand, I think we should implement this more simply. What do > you think of the attached patch?
... In any case, your patch fixes a very annoying bug. If Jordan prefers your patch over my suggestion (or, of course, either of you points out a bug in my suggestion), then I'm happy to give my R-b: Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]> I just think that we should fix the problem more directly, not unlike the following pattern: int function(type1 param1, ...) { static bool initialized; if (!initialized) { /* set up stuff at first call */ initialized = true; } /* do stuff needed for each call */ return 0; } Thanks, Laszlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
