On 09/20/13 17:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/09/2013 22:30, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> In a nutshell, VirtioPciSetDeviceStatus() breaks the interface contract
>> of VIRTIO_DEVICE_PROTOCOL.WriteDevice(). The former targets a common
>> virtio field, but the latter provides access to device-specific fields.
>> Consequently, the virtio device is never brought up, and the guest code
>> in VirtioFlush() waits for the hypervisor's reply in vain.
>>
>> I don't yet know enough about the series to suggest a fix (or to fix it
>> myself just so I can continue the testing and the review). I'd like to
>> get good test results before reviewing in more detail.
> 
> Maybe VirtioPciSetDeviceStatus and the other accesses to the common
> virtio fields should use PciIo directly?

Yes. Or maybe continue using the current PciIo wrapper, but expose the
offset base as a parameter (or extract a common helper function etc.)

Thanks,
Laszlo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to