On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Ian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:00 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote: >> What about when the next blob type needs to be transferred? > > When I put the SeaBIOS version together my intention was that the length > field would serve as a proxy for the struct version should we ever need > to extend it.
Okay. That should work. > From the Xen side unless there is some strong reason to deviate I would > prefer to stick with something which is similar to the existing > interface to other BIOSes, which is what Wei has proposed, rather than > reinvent it in a per-BIOS way. Ultimately this stuff won't be exposed to > UEFI outside of the Xen support code. Whoops. I asked if it followed a Xen convention, but then I missed where you replied in the affirmative. The biggest thing that bothers me is defining the addresses as 32-bit. But, if this doesn't worry you guys, then I guess it is unlikely to change soon. -Jordan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
