On 12/10/13 23:56, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 12/10/13 20:28, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> Laszlo,
>>>
>>> In comparing Olivier's v4 to your v5, I had some questions.
>>>
>>> Mainly, it seems like maybe some 'fixes' are sneaking into the commit
>>> where we convert to using the protocol.
>>
>> Those fixes are not "sneaking". I requested them explicitly in my v4
>> review. My method for preparing version 5 was:
>> - take Olivier's v4
>> - go through my review comments (and some of yours that I could find) on
>>   the list that have been posted for v4
>> - those comments pointed out problems in v4
>> - therefore I fixed those problems where they were introduced.
>>
>> Normally when a respin is done, if v(n) of a patch introduces a problem,
>> then v(n+1) simply avoids introducing the problem. Followup patches are
>> justified when:
>> - v(n) has been committed, or
>> - fixing problems in-place (ie. where v(n) introduces those problems)
>>   would be very hard / inconvenient (for example because it requires
>>   intrusive rebase in the rest of the series).
>>
>> None of this held for these changes.
> 
> I guess my question was, could any of these changes be considered
> necessary separate from this series? Or, are they all required
> specifically because of the conversion to using the protocol?

Apologies for the long intro above...

But, I did answer all your questions in the rest of your email
individually. (I'm actually not 100% sure that you've seen my answers!)

> 
> Your response above indicates they were issues introduced as part of
> the conversion process, and yes, in that case they should be fixed in
> the same commit in v5.

Yes. And I hoped that my individual answers to your questions lower down
were in support.

> As such, I will move forward with the patches as is. (I still need to
> review them a little more, and test VS builds.)

Thanks!
Laszlo


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to