On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:34:14PM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:31:48PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> > > On 05/14/14 00:13, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> >> > > > The SMBIOS specification requires some structure types to
> >> > > > contain reference fields to other structures' handles. When
> >> > > > InstallAllStructures() rebuilds the SMBIOS tables by traversing
> >> > > > an existing source table, the use of SMBIOS_HANDLE_PI_RESERVED
> >> > > > causes automatically generated, arbitrary handle numbers to be
> >> > > > assigned to each cloned structure. This causes all reference
> >> > > > handle fields to become invalid.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This patch modifies InstallAllStructures() to reuse the original
> >> > > > handle numbers supplied by the underlying VM, preserving the
> >> > > > correctness of any included handle references.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <so...@cmu.edu>
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >  OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c | 2 +-
> >> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c 
> >> > > > b/OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c
> >> > > > index 42a5132..ac48fb7 100644
> >> > > > --- a/OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c
> >> > > > +++ b/OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c
> >> > > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ InstallAllStructures (
> >> > > >      //
> >> > > >      // Log the SMBIOS data for this structure
> >> > > >      //
> >> > > > -    SmbiosHandle = SMBIOS_HANDLE_PI_RESERVED;
> >> > > > +    SmbiosHandle = SmbiosTable.Hdr->Handle;
> >> > > >      Status = Smbios->Add (
> >> > > >                         Smbios,
> >> > > >                         NULL,
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > This patch should be tested by Xen people (I'm CC'ing Wei Liu). In
> >> > > general it seems reasonable to me; it matches the smbios spec and the
> >> > > qemu-side code.
> >> > >
> >> > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the heads up. Anthony (CC'ed) is working on OVMF now and he's
> >> > also a maintainer for QEMU in Xen, so he might have a better idea than I
> >> > do. He gracefully offers help on testing this change. He shall let you
> >> > know if there's any problem.
> >>
> >> Here's a quick example of what I'm talking about:
> >>
> >> Handle 0x1000, DMI type 16, 23 bytes
> >> Physical Memory Array
> >>         Location: Other
> >>         Use: System Memory
> >>         Error Correction Type: Multi-bit ECC
> >>         Maximum Capacity: 2 GB
> >>         Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> >>         Number Of Devices: 1
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Handle 0x1300, DMI type 19, 31 bytes
> >> Memory Array Mapped Address
> >>         Starting Address: 0x00000000000
> >>         Ending Address: 0x0007FFFFFFF
> >>         Range Size: 2 GB
> >>         Physical Array Handle: 0x1000
> >>         Partition Width: 1
> >>
> >> The second struct (type 19) has a "Physical Array Handle set to
> >> 0x1000, which points it at the first one (type 16). If we renumber
> >> the structs and change the type16 handle without also editing the
> >> contents of the Phys. Array Handle in type 19, we end up with a
> >> "dangling reference"... Better to say it's the responsibility of
> >> the underlying VM to cross-link the structures correctly, and just
> >> use the original handle numbers as given.
> >>
> >
> > Ah, I see. Then it's definitely something that needs fixing.
> 
> It does seem like a good change. I expect Xen entries potentially
> reference each other in the same way.

Yes, it's look like there is a handle supply by Xen in the SMBIOS tables.

> So, Wei, Anthony, do you agree that this change should be okay for OVMF on 
> Xen?

I think it's correct, yes. I also gave a test run, and the guest start.
Feel free to add my test-by.

Regards,

-- 
Anthony PERARD

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to