I checked only for X64 but I think ia32 will be the same. 
OK, will test now.

On 28.08.2014, at 12:53, Gao, Liming wrote:

> Sergey:
>    Your change adds ASM_PFX() for the external variable to let it pass XLCANG 
> tool chain. Is it for IA32 Thunk16.nasm or X64 Thunk16.nasm or both?
>  
> Thanks
> Liming
> From: Sergey Isakov [mailto:isakov...@bk.ru] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:16 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/8] NASM: Object files; Thunk16; Require for 
> non-MSVC
>  
> Comments below
>  
> On 28.08.2014, at 7:54, Andrew Fish wrote:
> 
> 
>  
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Sergey Isakov <isakov...@bk.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> Jordan,
> There was no issue with gcc49 toolchain in x86_64.
> I made an attempt to use nasm with XCLANG toolset but failed on ld:
> I seems have to wait while Andrew make XCODE5 fully working.
>  
>  __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ is set to _ on clang (XCODE5). 
> This patch works for both GCC49 and XCLANG toolchain (compilation, not 
> concerning relocation problem)
> ---
> --- Thunk16.nasm   2014-08-26 22:45:26.000000000 +0400
> +++ New/Thunk16.nasm         2014-08-28 11:01:17.000000000 +0400
> @@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ SECTION .data
>  ;
>  ; These are global constant to convey information to C code.
>  ;
> -ASM_PFX(m16Size)         DW      InternalAsmThunk16 - m16Start
> -ASM_PFX(mThunk16Attr)    DW      _BackFromUserCode.ThunkAttrEnd - 4 - 
> m16Start
> -ASM_PFX(m16Gdt)          DW      _NullSeg - m16Start
> -ASM_PFX(m16GdtrBase)     DW      _16GdtrBase - m16Start
> -ASM_PFX(mTransition)     DW      _EntryPoint - m16Start
> +ASM_PFX(m16Size)         DW      ASM_PFX(InternalAsmThunk16) - 
> ASM_PFX(m16Start)
> +ASM_PFX(mThunk16Attr)    DW      _BackFromUserCode.ThunkAttrEnd - 4 - 
> ASM_PFX(m16Start)
> +ASM_PFX(m16Gdt)          DW      _NullSeg - ASM_PFX(m16Start)
> +ASM_PFX(m16GdtrBase)     DW      _16GdtrBase - ASM_PFX(m16Start)
> +ASM_PFX(mTransition)     DW      _EntryPoint - ASM_PFX(m16Start)
>  
>  SECTION .text
>  
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ BITS    64
>      ret
>  
>  _EntryPoint:
> -        DD      _ToUserCode - m16Start
> +        DD      _ToUserCode - ASM_PFX(m16Start)
>          DW      CODE16
>  _16Gdtr:
>          DW      GDT_SIZE - 1
> @@ -256,16 +256,16 @@ BITS    64
>      add     edi, eax                    ; edi <- linear address of 16-bit 
> stack
>      pop     rcx
>      rep     movsd                       ; copy RegSet
> -    lea     ecx, [rdx + (_BackFromUserCode.SavedCr4End - m16Start)]
> +    lea     ecx, [rdx + (_BackFromUserCode.SavedCr4End - ASM_PFX(m16Start))]
>      mov     eax, edx                    ; eax <- transition code address
>      and     edx, 0fh
>      shl     eax, 12                     ; segment address in high order 16 
> bits
> -    lea     ax, [rdx + (_BackFromUserCode - m16Start)]  ; offset address
> +    lea     ax, [rdx + (_BackFromUserCode - ASM_PFX(m16Start))]  ; offset 
> address
>      stosd                               ; [edi] <- return address of user 
> code
>    
>      sgdt    [rsp + 60h]       ; save GDT stack in argument space
>      movzx   r10, word [rsp + 60h]   ; r10 <- GDT limit 
> -    lea     r11, [rcx + (InternalAsmThunk16 - _BackFromUserCode.SavedCr4End) 
> + 0xf]
> +    lea     r11, [rcx + (ASM_PFX(InternalAsmThunk16) - 
> _BackFromUserCode.SavedCr4End) + 0xf]
>      and     r11, ~0xf            ; r11 <- 16-byte aligned shadowed GDT table 
> in real mode buffer
>      
>      mov     [rcx + (SavedGdt - _BackFromUserCode.SavedCr4End)], r10w      ; 
> save the limit of shadowed GDT table
>  
> ---
> 
> 
>  
> Actually I just noticed you are getting an illegal text-relocation error. 
> This is usually caused by an absolute relocation, and clang wants it to be IP 
> relative. Basically Xcode/clang only supports a subset of the relocations 
> that gcc uses for X64. 
> If I correctly understand you, compilation for Thunk16 is not possible in 
> XCLANG toolset because of idea of this codes?
> 
> 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Andrew Fish
> 
> 
> Sergey
>  
> On 28 авг. 2014 г., at 7:32, Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
>   What change do you make? In previous mail, you mention x86_64 there is no 
> issue.
>  
>  
> Liming,
>  
> On the various GNU (including clang) toolchains __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ is the 
> prefix applied to user labels (symbols visible to C) in assembly. Some 
> versions set it to '', and some version have it set to ‘_'
>  
> #define ASM_PFX(name) _CONCATENATE (__USER_LABEL_PREFIX__, name)
>  
> So you can have a bug that passes on one version and fails on another. 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Andrew Fish
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Liming
> From: Sergey Isakov [mailto:isakov...@bk.ru] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:42 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/8] NASM: Object files; Thunk16; Require for 
> non-MSVC
>  
> The error disappeared but I still have other mistakes
> ld: illegal text-relocation to '_NullSeg' in  … BaseLib.lib(Thunk16.obj) from 
> '_16GdtrBase’ in … BaseLib.lib(Thunk16.obj) for architecture x86_64
> Still in work
>  
> On 28 авг. 2014 г., at 0:33, Jordan Justen <jljus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Sergey Isakov <isakov...@bk.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> And one new question. Why _16GdtrBase with underscore while m16Start without
> it?
> 
> Does replacing m16Start with ASM_PFX(m16Start) help?
> 
> It looks like I didn't convert this up properly. The MASM code didn't
> use ASM_PFX...
> 
> -Jordan
> 
> 
> 
> ——
> ;
> ; These are global constant to convey information to C code.
> ;
> ASM_PFX(m16Size)         DW      InternalAsmThunk16 - m16Start
> ASM_PFX(mThunk16Attr)    DW      _BackFromUserCode.ThunkAttrEnd - 4 -
> m16Start
> ASM_PFX(m16Gdt)          DW      _NullSeg - m16Start
> ASM_PFX(m16GdtrBase)     DW      _16GdtrBase - m16Start
> ASM_PFX(mTransition)     DW      _EntryPoint - m16Start
> 
> —
> I got an error with this
> Thunk16.iii:60: error: symbol `m16Start' undefined
> 
> 
> On 27 авг. 2014 г., at 22:04, Jordan Justen <jljus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Sergey Isakov <isakov...@bk.ru> wrote:
> 
> Hi sirs,
> I tested Thunk16.nasm too. For x86_64 there is no issue.
> For ia32 compilation disasm shows not good codes
> ---------
> 00000000 <m16Start>:
>  0: 00 00                 add    %al,(%eax)
>  2: 00 00                 add    %al,(%eax)
> ...
> 
> 00000006 <_BackFromUserCode>:
>  6: 16                   push   %ss
>  7: 0e                   push   %cs
>  8: 67 e8 00 00 66 9c     addr16 call 9c66000e
> <InternalAsmThunk16+0x9c65ff36>
> 
> 0000000c <_BackFromUserCode.Base>:
>  c: 66 9c                 pushfw
>  e: fa                   cli
> 
> ---------
> to compare gcc-4.9.1 cvompilation
> ---------
> 00000000 <m16Start>:
>  0: 00 00                 add    %al,(%eax)
>  2: 00 00                 add    %al,(%eax)
> ...
> 
> 00000006 <BackFromUserCode>:
>  6: 16                   push   %ss
>  7: 0e                   push   %cs
>  8: 66 e8 00 00           callw  c <BackFromUserCode+0x6>
> ...
> 
> 0000000e <L_Base1>:
>  e: 66 9c                 pushfw
> 10: fa                   cli
> 
> ----------
> May be change a32 prefix to o32 in the line:
> "a32 call    .Base                       ; push eip"
> ?
> 
> 
> In the X64 file, I used:
> call    dword .Base
> 
> I notice this produced the same code as:
> o32 call    dword .Base
> 
> But,
> o32 call    .Base
> seems to produce invalid code. (OVMF hangs.)
> 
> It does seem like:
> a32 call    .Base
> is functional as well, but I know we are attempting to make the new
> nasm code produce similar code to the old asm code where reasonable.
> 
> I think I only changed it in the X64 file to try to match the old 'db' code.
> 
> -Jordan
> 
> On 27.08.2014, at 9:50, Jordan Justen wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jordan Justen
> <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> This series:
> 
> * Adds support for creating object files from .nasm source files to
> 
> allow NASM source files to be linked into libraries and images
> 
> * Adds NASM source files for Thunk16 on IA32 and X64
> 
> * Convert BaseLib to use NASM Source Files for Thunk16 rather than
> 
> GNU Assembler (.S) files
> 
> - This will make NASM a build requirement for MdePkg with IA32 &
> 
>   X64 on all toolchains except MSVC and ICC.
> 
> 
> Thanks for Liming Gao for the tools_def changes for MSVC. (But, these
> 
> have not been tested very well yet.)
> 
> 
> This series is available in this git branch:
> 
> https://github.com/jljusten/edk2.git nasm-v1
> 
> 
> I update my nasm branch based on the feedback.
> 
> The differences vs. v1 are in the attached patch.
> 
> Is anyone interested in seeing a v2 posted to the list?
> 
> Liming, in patch 1, I mentioned I only tested with GCC49. Did you have
> any testing to add to that?
> 
> -Jordan
> 
> Jordan Justen (8):
> 
> BaseTools/tools_def: Add NASM_FLAGS
> 
> BaseTools/build_rule: Add .nasm => .obj build rule
> 
> MdePkg/Base.h: Always define ASM_PFX
> 
> MdePkg/BaseLib Thunk16: Replace IA32 GAS Thunk16 with NASM version
> 
> MdePkg/BaseLib Thunk16: Replace X64 GAS Thunk16 with NASM version
> 
> MdePkg/BaseLib NASM Thunk16: Use NASM local labels
> 
> MdePkg/BaseLib NASM Thunk16: Use bits 16 for 16-bit code
> 
> MdePkg/BaseLib NASM Thunk16: Remove remaining 'DB' code
> 
> 
> BaseTools/Conf/build_rule.template       |  15 ++
> 
> BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template        | 287 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 
> MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h   |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Include/Arm/ProcessorBind.h       |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Include/Base.h                    |  25 ++-
> 
> MdePkg/Include/Ebc/ProcessorBind.h       |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Include/Ia32/ProcessorBind.h      |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Include/Ipf/ProcessorBind.h       |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Include/X64/ProcessorBind.h       |   4 +
> 
> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/BaseLib.inf       |   4 +-
> 
> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/Ia32/Thunk16.nasm | 260 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/X64/Thunk16.nasm  | 321
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 12 files changed, 914 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/Ia32/Thunk16.nasm
> 
> create mode 100644 MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/X64/Thunk16.nasm
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 2.1.0
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Slashdot TV.
> 
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> 
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> edk2-devel mailing list
> 
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> <compare-nasm-to-nasm-v1.patch>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.  
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to