just curious will there be any issues w.r.t calling conventions?

Neeraj




On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:39 AM, stanley.ganyezu <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Hi Andrew,
>
>          I will try your method. I sincerely appreciate your quick and
> professional answer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stanley
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Andrew Fish [mailto:[email protected]]
> *发送时间:* 2014年9月7日 2:59
> *收件人:* [email protected]
> *主题:* Re: [edk2] 答复: 答复: run SMM in 64-bit
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 11:40 AM, stanley.ganyezu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>   Hi Andrew,
>
>          Do Neeraj mentioned limitation have any influence on your method?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No the SDM is defining the initial state. It is a form of big real mode.
> You can still put the processor in protected mode (32-bit) and from
> protected mode you can enable PAE (32-bit, uses page tables to access
> memory > 4GB) or transition to Long mode (64-bit).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stanley
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Andrew Fish [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *发送时间:* 2014年9月7日 1:57
> *收件人:* [email protected]
> *主题:* Re: [edk2] 答复: run SMM in 64-bit
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 10:50 AM, stanley.ganyezu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>    Hi Neeraj,
>
>          Some server have multi PCI segment. These PCI segment are put
> above 4GB to save more memory space belowme
>
> 4GB for legacy device(some device only use 32-bit Memory Mapped IO
> space).My SMI want to access these PCI segment.
>
> But I can’t find a method to touch it in X64.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You need to enable PAE or put the processor in Long mode to access memory
> > 4GB.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stanley
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Neeraj Ladkani [mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>]
> *发送时间:* 2014年9月7日 0:58
> *收件人:* [email protected]
> *主题:* Re: [edk2] run SMM in 64-bit
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> as par SDM section 34.5.1. not sure if its a hardware limitation.
>
> be
>
>
>
> "After saving the current context of the processor, the processor
> initializes its core registers to the values shown in Table 34-4. Upon
> entering SMM, the PE and PG flags in control register CR0 are cleared,
> which places the processor
>
> in an environment similar to real-address mode. The differences between
> the SMM execution environment and the
>
> real-address mode execution environment are as follows:
>
> • The addressable address space ranges from 0 to FFFFFFFFH (4 GBytes).
>
> • The normal 64-KByte segment limit for real-address mode is increased to
> 4 GBytes.
>
> • The default operand and address sizes are set to 16 bits, which
> restricts the addressable SMRAM address space
>
> to the 1-MByte real-address mode limit for native real-address-mode code.
> However, operand-size and
>
> address-size override prefixes can be used to access the address space
> beyond the 1-MByte.​
>
>
>
>
>
>  I am just curious, what kind of limitations you are facing in 4 GB limit?
>
>
>
> Neeraj
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Fish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 3:52 AM, stanley.ganyezu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>   Hi Experts,
>
>          Currently, X86 cpu run SMM in 32-bit. There are a lot of
> limitation about 32-bit. I want to run SMM in 64-bit to access whole cpu
> address space,but I can’t figure it out.
>
>
>
> UEFI/PI systems run SMM in 64-bit mode? See UEFI Platform Initialization
> Specification Version 1.3. http://www.uefi.org/specifications
>
>
>
>
>
>   Can you give me some tips? Any suggestion will be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Put the system in Long mode, this requires page tables. The DXE IPL and
> 64-bit SEC in Ovmf both have code that transitions to 64-bit long mode.
>
>
> https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2/MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/
>
> https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/
>
>
>
> It is really dangerous to modify the SMM code if you do not fully
> understand it, since SMM runs at a higher privilege than the OS it is an
> attack point that the OS can not defend against.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stanley
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks
>
> Neeraj
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Neeraj
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to