Good suggestion. I agree both. I will update when I check in.

-----Original Message-----
From: Long, Qin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UEFI2.5 HASH2

The patch looks good to me.

Could you add some descriptions about EFI_HASH2_PROTOCOL in the Hash2.h? There 
are only some descriptions about EFI_HASH2_SERVICE_BINDING_PROTOCOL now.

In the driver implementation:
+#define HASH2_SERVICE_DATA_SIGNATURE  SIGNATURE_32 ('H', 's', '2', 'S')
I prefer to use the same-case letter for signature: ('H', 'S', '2', 'S')


Reviewed-by: Long, Qin ([email protected])


Best Regards & Thanks,
LONG, Qin

-----Original Message-----
From: Yao, Jiewen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:31 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UEFI2.5 HASH2

Hi
Many thanks to Long Qin, who found an error in EFI_HASH2_OUTPUT definition in 
Hash2.h.
Here is new patch.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

-----Original Message-----
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:38 AM
To: Justen, Jordan L; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] UEFI2.5 HASH2

Thanks for reminder.

Commit message: 
1) MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard: Add UEFI2.5 defined EFI_HASH2_PROTOCOL 
definition.
2) SecurityPkg/Hash2DxeCrypto: Add UEFI2.5 defined EFI_HASH2_PROTOCOL 
implementation.

Yes, it is written from scratch. There is no open source HASH protocol before.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

-----Original Message-----
From: Justen, Jordan L
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:03 AM
To: [email protected]; Yao, Jiewen
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UEFI2.5 HASH2

On 2015-04-25 20:49:55, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>    Hello
> 
>    Here is patch to add UEFI2.5 HASH2 protocol.
> 
>    Patch 1: Add HASH2 protocol.
> 
>    Patch 2: Add HASH2 driver.

Is this is the entire commit message for the two patches?

Based on the note above, it seems like you could *at least* reference the UEFI 
2.5 spec in the commit message.

After looking through the patches, I figured out that these patches were for 
SecurityPkg. Instead, I think you should prefix the subject line (the first 
line) of your commit message with the package. See:
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Commit-Message-Format

You should Cc Chao Zhang, who is listed as the SecurityPkg owner in 
Maintainers.txt.

Is this module entirely written from scratch, or is there some previously 
existing EDK II code that reviewers might be able to compare it with?

-Jordan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest 
out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, 
stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with 
transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to