On 2015-05-09 13:15:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> According to the UEFIv2.5 spec section 6.2, the allocations returned
> by the AllocatePool () boot service must be 8 byte aligned.
> 
> So make our implementation conform to the spec, by rearranging the
> pool head struct so that its size is always a multiple of 8 bytes.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c 
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
> index ac717fb65f7a..6f8f5cfb295d 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Pool.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ typedef struct {
>  #define POOL_HEAD_SIGNATURE   SIGNATURE_32('p','h','d','0')
>  typedef struct {
>    UINT32          Signature;
> -  UINT32          Reserved;
>    EFI_MEMORY_TYPE Type;
>    UINTN           Size;
> +  UINTN           Reserved;
>    CHAR8           Data[1];
>  } POOL_HEAD;

So the issue is if sizeof(EFI_MEMORY_TYPE) == 4 on a 64-bit machine and the
compiler doesn't 64-bit align the 64-bit Size field?

With your change, couldn't there be an issue if the compiler made
EFI_MEMORY_TYPE 64-bits, and once again chose not to 64-bit align Size
and Reserved?

Maybe this alignment should be handled in CoreAllocatePoolI? (Could we
try to drop both Reserved and Data from that structure?)

-Jordan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to