On 11 June 2015 at 20:57, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/11/15 15:50, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 10 June 2015 at 19:22, Long, Qin <qin.l...@intel.com> wrote: >>> Thanks, Ard. >>> >>> This is one historical changes, and come from some early user's requests: >>> they would like to keep the built result / image of this module identical >>> as possible, whatever any path was used (e.g. aaa/edk2/.../openssl v.s. >>> bbb/edk2/...openssl, ...). To meet this, we have to patch those __FILE__ >>> macro then. :-( >>> >> >> OK, fair enough. >> >>> I keep this for all later updates. >>> >> >> I guess not all toolchains support >> >> #undef __FILE__ >> #define __FILE__ NULL >> >> ?? >> >> because that would be a bit simpler. > > It would also be undefined behavior. The C standards say that > > None of these macro names, nor the identifier "defined", shall be the > subject of a #define or a #undef preprocessing directive. >
OK, got it. -- Ard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
