On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:14:39 -0500, Bruce Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Rich Ulrich wrote:
[ snip, including earlier post ] 
> > That ANOVA is inherently a 2-sided test.  So is the traditional 2x2
> > contingency table.   That is because,  sides  refer to  hypotheses.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
> I agree with you Rich, except that I don't find "2-sided" all that
> appropriate for describing ANOVA.  For an ANOVA with more than 2 groups,
> there are MULTIPLE patterns of means that invalidate the null hypothesis,
> not just 2. With only 3 groups,for example:
> 
>       A < B < C
>       A < C < B
>       B < A < C
 [ ... ]

> And then if you included all of the cases where 2 of the means are equal
> to each other, but not equal to the 3rd mean, there are several more
> possibilities.  And these ways of departing from 3 equal means do not
> correspond to tails in some distribution.
> 
> There's my attempt to add to the confusion.  ;-)

If I convince people that they want only one *contrast*  for their
ANOVA, then it is just two-sided.  I've been talking people out
of blindly testing multiple-groups and multiple periods, for years.

Then I have to start over on the folks, to convince them about 
MANOVA.  If there are two groups and two variables, 
there are FOUR sides -- and that's if you just count what is
'significant' by the single variables.  Most of the possible results
are not useful ones; that is, they are not easily interpretable, when
no variable is 'significant' by itself, or when logical directions
seem to conflict.

We can interpret "group A is better than B."  And we analyze 
measures that have the scaled meaning, where one end is better.
So the sensible analysis uses a defined contrast, the 'composite 
score';  and then you don't have to use the MANOVA packages, 
and you have the improved power of testing just one or two sides.

-- 
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to