I guess I shouldn't be surprised that comments in this thread can range from
the sublime to the utterly tasteless from supposed professionals. Way to go.
reg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: Help me an idiot
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 20:25:36 -0700, James H. Steiger <not@my_address>
> wrote:
>
> >If you read my post carefully, (assuming it made
> >your server), you will see that
> >it, indeed, gives the combinations solution you gave
> >below, and shows that it is equivalent to
> >another, more elegant way of arriving at the same
> >answer, i.e.,
> >
> >2^N = (in this case) 2^5 = 32
> >
> >
>
> It's amazing how much effort y'all put into doing some lazy pricks
> homework for him
>
>
> Gary Carson
> http://www.garycarson.com
>
>
> =================================================================
> Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
> the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
> http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
> =================================================================
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
