i would definitely agree that grading and QC are fundamentally and philosophically different in their level and kind of detail, and in the correlation between numbers representing physical measurements and the desired results. however, if he recognized the essential difference in these 2 kinds of evaluation, this tends to raise his credibility in my estimation. > If not, it follows (at the best) that he did not consider academic > grading to have much to do with industrial quality control. Therefore, his > expertise in the latter field should not give him much credibility on the > former. > > -Robert Dawson -- Any resemblance of any of the above opinions to anybody's official position is completely coincidental. Muriel Strand, P.E. Air Resources Engineer CA Air Resources Board 2020 L Street Sacramento, CA 59814 916-324-9661 916-327-8524 (fax) www.arb.ca.gov
- Re: adjusting marks Michael Granaas
- Re: adjusting marks David A. Heiser
- Re: adjusting marks Eric Bohlman
- Re: adjusting marks Peter Westfall
- Re: adjusting marks Jim Clark
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Peter Westfall
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming dennis roberts
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Donald F. Burrill
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Robert Dawson
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Peter Westfall
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Muriel Strand
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Consultantssuck
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Joe Ward
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Donald F. Burrill
- Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming Jim Clark
- Re: adjusting marks Muriel Strand
- Re: adjusting marks Michael Atherton
- empirical is not statistical Muriel Strand
- Re: empirical is not statistical Michael Atherton
- Re: empirical is not statistical Muriel Strand
- Re: empirical is not statistical Jan de Leeuw
