----  Robert Knodt writes in response to the message at http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network    (SEE BELOW) -------
 
Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming
 
It would be nice if those sending to the mailing list would clearly identify themselves. It would also be nice if they used an e-mail address so individuals might send them e-mail directly.
Thanks,
 
Dr. Robert C. Knodt
4949 Samish Way, #31
Bellingham, WA 98226
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
----------------  End of Robert Knodt's message
 
---------------- Beginning of Joe Ward's comment --
 
Good comment, Robert --
 
Perhaps the unidentified writer is a frustrated product of "Non-mastery" Spelling Education
and is intentionally (or unintentionally) showing the results.
 
See BOLD items below.
 
 -- Joe
************************************************************************
* Joe Ward                                  Health Careers High School *
* 167 East Arrowhead Dr                     4646 Hamilton Wolfe        *
* San Antonio, TX 78228-2402                San Antonio, TX 78229      *
* Phone: 210-433-6575                       Phone: 210-617-5400        *
* Fax: 210-433-2828                         Fax: 210-617-5423          *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                    *
* http://www.ijoa.org/joeward/wardindex.html                           *
************************************************************************
 
-----  End of Joe Ward's comment ------
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Consultantssuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming

| Dr. Deming Naive? You, sir, are misguided and unfortunately,
| misinformed of the genius of the master Dr. Shewhart, and his
| disiple and messenger to the latter half of the 20th century,
| Dr. Deming.
|
| Humans want to do a good job. Dr. Deming was pellucid on this
| point.   People and school fit nicely into this axiom.
|
| what you fail to understand is the profound knowledge of
| thinking preparing, and continual improvement.  Grading is nice,
| succinct, and above all, usually useless in its existing
| design.  Does grading permit our student to readdress problem or
| slow areas?  In many cases grading only shows how well you did,
| based on varying factors-The next test, completely different.
|
| we have all seen studies where the pretty girl is awarded better
| grades for the same caliber of work as others.  we have all
| seen  reports where teachers are wrong in their suppositions,
| then corrected or challenged by students, ultimately leading
| these educators to hold a grudge for "attitude and behavior"
| when report card time recurs.
|
| Do you want to know why the AFT and the NEA are against teaching
| LOGIC in elementary schools (Logic being the foundation for all
| higher math applications)?
|
| Could it be because some protege will learn to ask the harder
| questions?  Possibly Some "smart alec" will not accept our
| educator's "Because I told you it did."
|
| A recent report found Elementary educators, when pressed for
| answers they did not know, simply "winged it."  This sophristry
| unfortunately happens when our educators are not versed in the
| sciences, history or math, and they wish to appear (to
| themselves and) to their students, smart.
|
| People want to do a good job.  Grading allows teachers to make
| decisions in our children's early years based on mostly the
| faliable educator's emotions toward that one particular budding
| mind.   Grading should be benchmarks for ever improvement based
| on practice, practice practice of the fundementals. Then of
| course moving foward with a keen sence of where the student is
| going.  Any good music teacher will tell you the ones who
| practice the fundemental scales, dilegently, go on to master the
| difficult pieces.
|
| Read the book OUT OF CRISES again, and again.  I assure you, you
| will soon "get it."
|
|
|
| * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
| The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
|
|
|
| ===========================================================================
|   This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
|   for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
|   or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
|   offensive email.
|
|   For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
|   http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
| ===========================================================================
|

Reply via email to