My son and I have written a statistics tutorial for the computer and in
it we provide an answer to your question. The tutorial is available for
$19.95 from my son's websit:
www.animatedsoftware.com
but if you send me an email I can arange for you to download a review
copy free.
Howard > Hoffman
steinberg wrote:
> I am seeking better understanding of the concept of degrees of
> freedom. Here's what I think I know:
>
> 1) Whenever a sum of squares is estimated, the result is
> constrained by the fact that the deviations about the mean must
> sum to zero. The number of scores free to vary is therefor n-1.
>
> 2) When estimating the population SD from a sample, SS/n is a
> biased estimate because the sample tends to be less variable than
> the population from which it comes. SS/(n-1) is an unbiased
> estimate.
>
> Here are the problems I am having:
>
> a) I have difficulty seeing the relation between 1 and 2 above.
> That is, given that 1 is true, it does not seem to imply that n-1
> is better than n when estimating sigma. This is implied from 2.
>
> b) I am looking at the ANOVA table for a regression with two
> preditors and n=395. The total df is 394. I can explain that from
> either 1 or 2 above. However the df for regression is 2. Doesn't
> the fact that a sum of squares was computed for regression have
> an impact here as in 1 above? Isn't SSR also an estimate as in 2
> above?
>
> Milton Steinberg
===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
offensive email.
For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================