On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:52:58 -0400, sowmya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm looking for references for my thesis. I'm working with a
> longitudinal study with 4 waves of follow-up. At each wave
> non-respondents to the previous wave are followed. In health surveys,
> most of the time, non-respondents are followed as long as funding is
> available to do so. I'm interested in being able to make a decision on
> when to stop following subjects  based on the amount of change in the
> point estimates that occurs by sampling the non-respondents. So I'm

I am having trouble with terminology.  Or you are.

"Waves of followup" used to mean that the people who were tracked at 5
years (say) were also recorded at 10 years.  

Finding the "non-respondents" is something that you do several times
in trying to complete a single *wave*.  If they are not at the same
address, you look in the phone book.  Then you ask their
employer/union/insurance company.  Then you ask a neighbor.  Then you
look for death certificates.  Then you ask for whatever the Social
Security Administration may tell you, though I think that is very
little.

All of that is in one wave;  and you hope that the items you are
tracking are not correlated with the difficulty of finding the people;
else, you might have to make estimates about *why* there is a
correlation.

Have you messed up the question?

-- 
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html


===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone.  Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages.  Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.

For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================

Reply via email to