I also agree, and have the same concern.

To test
     Ho:   d<=0
     Ha:   d>0
one gives the null the 'maximum benefit of the doubt' (expressed in terms of court 
cases) and use the boundary value d=0 to assess the alternative. This happens to have 
the mathematical advantage of  providing a unique value of the parameter d
so that the test can actually be carried out.

Regards,
Alan

"William B. Ware" wrote:

> On 8 May 2000, Richard M. Barton wrote:
>
> > ***Technically incorrect?  I'm not so sure.  I just looked in stat books by 13 
>authors, to see how null and alternative hypotheses were presented in a one-tailed 
>testing situation.  Most of my books are from the social sciences.  Results:
> >
> > 1 texts presented hypotheses in the form of
> >     Ho:   d<=0
> >     Ha:   d>0
> >
> > 10 presented in the form of
> >    Ho:  d=0
> >    Ha:  d>0
> >
> > 2 presented both forms
>
> I happen to agree with Don's assertion that this "incomplete" form is
> technically incorrect.  My concern is the implication of Richard's finding
> as an assessment of the quality of the texts that are being used...
>
> WBW
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> William B. Ware, Professor and Chair               Educational Psychology,
> CB# 3500                                       Measurement, and Evaluation
> University of North Carolina                         PHONE  (919)-962-7848
> Chapel Hill, NC      27599-3500                      FAX:   (919)-962-1533
> http://www.unc.edu/~wbware/                          EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __________________________________________________________________________
>
> ===========================================================================
> This list is open to everyone.  Occasionally, less thoughtful
> people send inappropriate messages.  Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
> THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
> way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
> termination of the list.
>
> For information about this list, including information about the
> problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
> unsubscribe, please see the web page at
> http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
> ===========================================================================

--
Alan McLean ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics
Monash University, Caulfield Campus, Melbourne
Tel:  +61 03 9903 2102    Fax: +61 03 9903 2007




===========================================================================
This list is open to everyone.  Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages.  Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.

For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===========================================================================

Reply via email to