dennis roberts wrote:
>
> i would say that what bob has indicated below is BIAS ... not consistency
Of course it's bias... but bias *does* imply inconsistency. It's a
simple implication between two important concepts, so makes a good point
to mention.
-Robert Dawson
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- consistent statistic Chuck Cleland
- Re: consistent statistic Vadim Marmer
- Re: consistent statistic Glen Barnett
- Re: consistent statistic Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: consistent statistic Eric Zivot
- Re: consistent statistic Anon.
- Re: consistent statistic dennis roberts
- Re: consistent statistic Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: consistent statistic Art Kendall
- Re: consistent statistic Bill Jefferys
- Re: consistent statistic Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: consistent statistic Glen Barnett
- Re: consistent statistic Rich Ulrich
- Re: consistent statistic Gautam Sethi
- Re: consistent statistic Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: consistent statistic Thomas Gatliffe
- Re: consistent statistic Rich Ulrich
- Re: consistent statistic Tom Gatliffe
