[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Comments, please, on the relative merits of the standard textbooks:
> Bickel & Doksum
> Casella & Berger
> Cox & Hinkley
> Or is there some other book that you prefer? This question has been
> posted before, but nobody responded, so I'm asking again. Surely someone
> out there has an opinion!
Depends on what you want to do with it. I somewhat prefer Casella
and Berger to Cox and Hinkley for my purposes, but that's not going
to be the same as what you want to use it for. Both are reasonable.
I'm not familiar with Bickel and Doksum's book, though if their papers
are anything to go by, it should be fairly readable.
Glen
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
