In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rodney Sparapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) they didn't examine the undervotes in the original count or the
state-law mandated
> re-count; it's only in the third count where they are considering
them, which is what
> is so disturbing.
>
i tell you want I find disturbing:
the "chad undercount error" that was discovered in the Volusia
county complete hand count went 62% to Gore and 38% to Bush.
However, as a whole, Volusia was only 53% Gore and 45% Bush.
Since when do chads play favorites, or is this entirely realistic
is one were to model chad failure as a Poisson process?
mlewis
ut southwestern medical center at dallas
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
