Herman Rubin wrote:
> Those who voted for Bush
<snip>
> and so push harder on the punch to make sure that it
> went all the way through.
A related interpretation is that those who were voting Gore
were less certain that they had chosen the right hole, so pressed
less positively. [They would have been quite right too -- as an
experimental test has shown!]
Peter
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Rodney Sparapani
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... mal11
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Thom Baguley
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Robert Chung
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of e... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Rich Ulrich
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of e... Herman Rubin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Robert Chung
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... P.G.Hamer
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... mal11
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of e... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of e... Rich Ulrich
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Paul Thompson
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Neil W. Henry
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of e... Tom Johnstone
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Ronald Bloom
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Ron Hardin
- Re: NY Times on "statisticians' view" of electi... Ronald Bloom
