On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:42:02 -0500, Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>alf>
>> The problem is not the existence of literature, the problem is the
>> content.
> [ snip, ... essentially 'cite the good literature, in great detail' ]
Not exactly -- I was asking for 'the good literature' in the context
of clinical judgment and actuarial predictions.
>Was that "name calling"? I said that the your hostile criticism of
>Jim (which I quoted), lacks apparent (face) validity since it is
>illogical and badly written. And, I guess, it is unfriendly and in
>bad taste. Someone can disagree if they please.
I agree, your replies are more elaborated, however, I feel my
standpoint more reasonable.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
