On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Bob Wheeler wrote:
> I've heard this before -- probably read it in stat
> books. It isn't true. Galton worried over the
> problem until he understood the statistical
> mechanism.
you may abe right; that's why I said apparrently
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean Robert Chung
- Re: regression to the mean J. Williams
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean Bob Wheeler
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean J. Williams
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank
