On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Bob Wheeler wrote: > I've heard this before -- probably read it in stat > books. It isn't true. Galton worried over the > problem until he understood the statistical > mechanism. you may abe right; that's why I said apparrently ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean Robert Chung
- Re: regression to the mean J. Williams
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean Bob Wheeler
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean J. Williams
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank