Paul R Swank forwarded Dennis' scattterplot:
> > - *
> > post - * *
> > - *
> > - 2 *
> > 80+ * 2 *
> > - 2 * * *
> > - * * *
> > - * *
> > - * *
> > 60+
> > - * *
> > - * * *
> > -
> > - *
> > 40+ *
> > -
> > -
> > ----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--pre
> > 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Aha! So that's how to compute a marginal PDF! <grin>
-Robert
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean Bob Wheeler
- Re: regression to the mean Elliot Cramer
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean J. Williams
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Robert J. MacG. Dawson
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean Paul R Swank
- regression to the mean
- Re: regression to the mean dennis roberts
- Re: regression to the mean J E H Shaw
- Re: regression to the mean Rich Ulrich
- Re: regression to the mean Herman Rubin
