In article <94i9b3$2j2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ken K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

#S+ - I hear it is becoming very popular with the stat development bunch. 
#It is easier to do new neat stuff with S+ than with SAS. It appears to be 
##more complicated than some others, but as I said I don't have much exposure to
#S+.

If you are considering S+ you should look first at R to see if it has 
what you need. R is a freeware version of S+; it lacks some features but 
may have everything you need. Also, S+ (at least the versions I have 
used) has a well-known memory allocation bug that causes memory 
requirements to increase rapidly as a large calculation proceeds. It may 
have been fixed in recent versions, but R does not have this bug.

Go to http://www.R-project.org/

Bill

-- 
Bill Jefferys/Department of Astronomy/University of Texas/Austin, TX 78712
Email: replace 'warthog' with 'clyde' | Homepage: quasar.as.utexas.edu
I report spammers to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger for PGP Key: F7 11 FB 82 C6 21 D8 95  2E BD F7 6E 99 89 E1 82
Unlawful to use this email address for unsolicited ads: USC Title 47 Sec 227


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to