jim clark wrote:
> I assume by items you mean the 8 items that produced the scores
> from 0 to 8. The layout will depend on whether the same 8 items
> were used in all of the conditions, or if some of your conditions
> are between-item effects (e.g., concreteness, frequency). If the
> same 8 in all conditions, then you would have 8 cases with
> 3x2x2x5 = 60 scores for each. Probably not a very powerful
> analysis, which could be problematic if you were planning to
> combine the subject and item analyses (e.g., Min F'). If not the
> same 8 in all conditions, then you need to provide more
> information about the design of the study.
>
> Best wishes
> Jim
Depending on the design, minF' may not be necessary (or
appropriate). Take a look at
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F.
(1999). How to deal with "The language-as fixed-effect fallacy":
Common misconceptions and solutions. Journal of Memory and Language,
41, 416-426.
Thom
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
