It will depend on the journal to which you are submitting the research. I would go for ii) and iii) provided appropriate N and summary stats (means and s.d. or whatever are given somewhere in the article)*.
The use of z or T largely depends on whether the large sample normal approximation is used. Thom * means and s.d. (or equivalents) are preferred summary stats because they can be readily used in secondary analyses - not because a Wilcoxon T is reported. Jan Malte Wiener wrote: > hi, > i am trying to find out how to quote a wilcoxon signed rank test > correctly in a publication. i have found that (i) only the p-value is > reported, (ii) the p- and a T-value are reported or (iii) that the p- > and a Z-value are reported. > what is the correct way to quote wilcoxon signed rank tests? > thanks for any answer, > jan . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
