I would go with ii or iii because you don't want to force your reader to do mental calculations
As for t vs z, that would depend on the disciplines' conventions (e.g. always uses t, or uses t for small samples, z for large). Be sure to include descriptive statistics that would be used for a meta analysis, also the a priori alpha that obtained alphas will be compared to. Since many disciplines follow the APA publication guidelines, etc., see Wilkinson, L, & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). "Statistical methods in psychology journal: Guidelines and explanations." American Psychologist, _54_, 594-604. Jan Malte Wiener wrote: > hi, > i am trying to find out how to quote a wilcoxon signed rank test > correctly in a publication. i have found that (i) only the p-value is > reported, (ii) the p- and a T-value are reported or (iii) that the p- > and a Z-value are reported. > what is the correct way to quote wilcoxon signed rank tests? > thanks for any answer, > jan . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
