- to the world, and Dennis.
On 13 Jan 2003 14:59:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dennis roberts) wrote:

> At 04:07 PM 1/13/2003, Rich Ulrich wrote:
> 
> >Exactly on this topic, I see a serious mis-statment in the document,
> >under "Planning a study to yield a certain margin of error (M)".
> >
> >Where it says,
> >"how large of a SAMPLE  would I need,
> >with 95% confidence, to produce an interval ...."  - it ought to say,
> >"... with 50% confidence, ..."
> >
> >since it is doing only the simplest extrapolation from the
> >point-estimate of the SD  the pilot study.  That 95%  was
> >pulled out of thin air, or borrowed by accident (I guess) from
> >the size of the CI.  It is unaccounted for; it is a mistake.
> >(But it is not surprising.  This power stuff is tricky, and I think
> >  that I remember making that same mistake, back when I first
> >started worrying about these, and before I found that "anchor.")
> 
> are you saying that a 95% CI is a 50% CI? if so, explain
> 

So, you  *are*  confusing the two assertions that you make, 
confusing likelihood of the outcome with the size of the CI.
I tried to clarify how and why those differed.  I

Your statement should read, 
"How large of a SAMPLE  would I need 
in order to have 50% assurance (power, confidence)
that it will produce a 95% confidence interval of +/-  .05 ... "

I gave you the 100% assurance/ power  version:
variance is fixed (for example, polls).

I explained why your result was 50%: point-estimate
being replicated.

I showed, by example, how you compute the actual power
by using the chi squared distribution.

Now I have explained what the problem is with your syntax,
since you apparently fixed on  (mis)reading your own,
instead of reading what I contributed.   You *made*  a power
statement.  "... need, with 95% confidence"  is  distinct from
" ... to produce a 95% confidence interval."

That about covers it, except, if you have a textbook that sows 
so much confusion, I'm willing to write to the authors.
But I suggest that you check exactly how they phrase
whatever they say.
[ ... ]

-- 
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to