Donald Burrill wrote: > > Paul's definitions sound to me very much like definitions for a > *psychological* experiment. I cannot imagine a physicist, for example,
I think they were too narrow also for psychological experiments. The idea of categorical IVs and controls being defining features of an experiment seems overly strict (though they are typical/characteristic features). Thom . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
