In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This was posted by someone on the apstat list ... and, seems like an 
>interesting problem to pass along to you.

=============
>A class of 5 students took a test on statistics. The results were Ann - 70,
>Belinda - 40, Cal - 40, Daniel - 40 and Erika - 40. The teacher standardised
>the scores. Ann earned a z-score of 1.79 (to 2 decimal places).

>The next week the same class took another test. Ann studied really hard and
>blitzed the test. The results were Ann - 100, Belinda - 40, Cal - 40, Daniel -
>40 and Erika - 40. Ann was really proud of her achievement. But then the
>teacher standardised the scores. Ann was devastated - her z-score was still
>1.79.

>Ann decided that studying hard was a waste of time so she decided to watch TV
>instead of study. The results on that week's test were predictable: Ann - 45,
>Belinda - 40, Cal - 40, Daniel - 40 and Erika - 40. Ann thought that maybe she
>should have studied after all. But then the teacher standardised the scores.
>Ann was right the first time - studying is a waste of time! Her z-score was
>still 1.79.

>What gives?
>[This remarkable result is from an article in the Australian Senior 
>Mathematics
>Journal, Vol 17, No 1, by Ed Staples


One should never "standardize" the data.

Anyone who lets statistical methods do the thinking neither
thinks nor is correctly using statistics.



-- 
This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         Phone: (765)494-6054   FAX: (765)494-0558
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to