I would check to see if there was a data entry or data definition error if I found such a pattern.
Art [EMAIL PROTECTED] Social Research Consultants University Park, MD USA (301) 864-5570 jim clark wrote: > Hi > This is a concern because > the pattern in the data for a 4th order contrast would have to be > similar to +1 -4 +6 -4 +1 or its inverse. What are the odds you > "expected" this pattern? > > . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
