i'm not certain this is the exact answer to your question, but when i do conjoint analyses, i use the Categories module from SPSS. this uses the fractional replication algorithm to give you the actual scenarios you need. the main thing to be aware of is that Categories assumes no interactions, it's strictly a main effects model. there is software out of Brussels (i think) called SPEED that includes interactions in its conjoint models. i have no experience using it however.
hopes this helps [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasad) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Hi > > I'm a research professional based in India. I'm facing a research > problem, which requires conjoint analysis. The study involves 27 > attributes and 200 levels in all. From literature, I've identified > hybrid conjoint as the most pertinent conjoint design. Sawtooth > published a per title Adaptive Choice Based Conjoint (ACBC). > > I would like to adiminister Choice Based Conjoint (CBC)involving 10 > attributes to each individual. However, these 10 attributes would be > the ones considered moost pertinent/important by him. Similarly, i > would like to have those attribute levels which are relevant to him. I > was hoping to use Self explicatory ratings to obtain this information. > So, a hybrid conjoint involving ACA and CBC would have been perfect. > > Is there any software which I could use. Sawtooth doesn't have a > commercial version yet for ACBC. > > Can someone please help me out? Finally, the entire conjoint exercise > has to be web-based. There is no alternative for that. We also want > the two stages to happen immediately after each other. > > Awaiting reply > > Thanks > Prasad . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
